From 'On the Contrary' by Michael A. Hoffman II: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/
Under the 1996 Arbitration Act, rabbinic courts are recognized in the law of Great Britain as tribunals to settle civil disputes, if both sides agree to their authority. If the Talmudists can have their courts in Britain, why not the Muslims?
Under the 1996 Arbitration Act, rabbinic courts are recognized in the law of Great Britain as tribunals to settle civil disputes, if both sides agree to their authority. If the Talmudists can have their courts in Britain, why not the Muslims?